<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: We&#8217;re Paying Our Speakers a Percentage</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.tradeshowstartup.com/2007/10/03/were-paying-our-speakers-a-percentage/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.tradeshowstartup.com/2007/10/03/were-paying-our-speakers-a-percentage/</link>
	<description>Lessons From the Launch of Tradeshows &#38;  Internet Media</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2009 14:59:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Marlys Arnold</title>
		<link>http://www.tradeshowstartup.com/2007/10/03/were-paying-our-speakers-a-percentage/comment-page-1/#comment-21052</link>
		<dc:creator>Marlys Arnold</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Nov 2007 00:28:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tradeshowstartup.com/2007/10/03/were-paying-our-speakers-a-percentage/#comment-21052</guid>
		<description>Kudos to you for realizing the value of what your speakers provide!

As a speaker and occasional event organizer, I see both sides of this dilemma. However,
my speaker side usually wins. Here&#039;s a comparison I often use:

&quot;You go to the dentist and he says you need a root canal. You tell him how much you 
appreciate his expertise, but don&#039;t feel like you should have to pay for his services.
Instead, you&#039;ll be happy to recommend him to all your friends -- he&#039;ll have free exposure!
Now, how likely will your dentist agree to this arrangement? I&#039;m guessing not!&quot;

Likewise, when speakers take the time and energy to create a presentation for a conference
(often a custom one), they deserve some type of compensation. Without that, a planner is
just asking for trouble, with speakers who are happy to speak for free, knowing that
they&#039;ll use it as an infomercial for their company or product.

So thanks for recognizing that information is a valuable tool and worthy of compensation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kudos to you for realizing the value of what your speakers provide!</p>
<p>As a speaker and occasional event organizer, I see both sides of this dilemma. However,<br />
my speaker side usually wins. Here&#8217;s a comparison I often use:</p>
<p>&#8220;You go to the dentist and he says you need a root canal. You tell him how much you<br />
appreciate his expertise, but don&#8217;t feel like you should have to pay for his services.<br />
Instead, you&#8217;ll be happy to recommend him to all your friends &#8212; he&#8217;ll have free exposure!<br />
Now, how likely will your dentist agree to this arrangement? I&#8217;m guessing not!&#8221;</p>
<p>Likewise, when speakers take the time and energy to create a presentation for a conference<br />
(often a custom one), they deserve some type of compensation. Without that, a planner is<br />
just asking for trouble, with speakers who are happy to speak for free, knowing that<br />
they&#8217;ll use it as an infomercial for their company or product.</p>
<p>So thanks for recognizing that information is a valuable tool and worthy of compensation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim Bourquin</title>
		<link>http://www.tradeshowstartup.com/2007/10/03/were-paying-our-speakers-a-percentage/comment-page-1/#comment-18088</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Bourquin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Oct 2007 00:19:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tradeshowstartup.com/2007/10/03/were-paying-our-speakers-a-percentage/#comment-18088</guid>
		<description>Hi Charles - 

No that&#039;s not what I&#039;m talking about.  A fan of a product who likes a product enough to recommend it in a session is not doing a sales pitch.  But I think we all know deep down when someone is pitching a company or product they are affiliated with or employed by rather than just telling people about something they like.

We already give a free full-conference ticket to our speakers, but I&#039;m ready to take the conference to an even higher level, and to me that means having the speakers compensated for what they do.

Tim</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Charles &#8211; </p>
<p>No that&#8217;s not what I&#8217;m talking about.  A fan of a product who likes a product enough to recommend it in a session is not doing a sales pitch.  But I think we all know deep down when someone is pitching a company or product they are affiliated with or employed by rather than just telling people about something they like.</p>
<p>We already give a free full-conference ticket to our speakers, but I&#8217;m ready to take the conference to an even higher level, and to me that means having the speakers compensated for what they do.</p>
<p>Tim</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charles Stricklin</title>
		<link>http://www.tradeshowstartup.com/2007/10/03/were-paying-our-speakers-a-percentage/comment-page-1/#comment-17963</link>
		<dc:creator>Charles Stricklin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Oct 2007 07:37:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tradeshowstartup.com/2007/10/03/were-paying-our-speakers-a-percentage/#comment-17963</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m a little concerned about the &quot;even a subtle sales pitch in their session will result in not getting paid their percentage.&quot; Like advertisers and sponsors to podcasts, the producers likely endorses products they genuinely appreciate and use. If, during a presentation, I were to mention or demonstrate the use of product X, would I then be penalized accordingly?

An example: Don McAllister gave a very interesting presentation on techniques he uses to produce screencasts. While doing so, he demonstrated a Mac-only software package he uses called Mousepos&#233; 2, to the delight of those attending. Immediately after that part was completed, someone near me said in a voice loud enough to be heard throughout the room, &quot;Congratulations, Don, you&#039;ve just sold 200 copies of Mousepos&#233;!&quot;

Maybe I misunderstand or I&#039;m just over-reacting, but in that case would Don be precluded from receiving compensation for an otherwise excellent presentation?

My alternative suggestion would simply be: If you lead a session, no expo registration fee for you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m a little concerned about the &#8220;even a subtle sales pitch in their session will result in not getting paid their percentage.&#8221; Like advertisers and sponsors to podcasts, the producers likely endorses products they genuinely appreciate and use. If, during a presentation, I were to mention or demonstrate the use of product X, would I then be penalized accordingly?</p>
<p>An example: Don McAllister gave a very interesting presentation on techniques he uses to produce screencasts. While doing so, he demonstrated a Mac-only software package he uses called Mousepos&eacute; 2, to the delight of those attending. Immediately after that part was completed, someone near me said in a voice loud enough to be heard throughout the room, &#8220;Congratulations, Don, you&#8217;ve just sold 200 copies of Mousepos&eacute;!&#8221;</p>
<p>Maybe I misunderstand or I&#8217;m just over-reacting, but in that case would Don be precluded from receiving compensation for an otherwise excellent presentation?</p>
<p>My alternative suggestion would simply be: If you lead a session, no expo registration fee for you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
