<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What Did I Just Do?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.tradeshowstartup.com/2005/06/10/what-did-i-just-do/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.tradeshowstartup.com/2005/06/10/what-did-i-just-do/</link>
	<description>Lessons From the Launch of Tradeshows &#38;  Internet Media</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2009 14:59:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Tim Bourquin</title>
		<link>http://www.tradeshowstartup.com/2005/06/10/what-did-i-just-do/comment-page-1/#comment-21</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Bourquin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jun 2005 21:48:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tradeshowstartup.com/?p=31#comment-21</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s the problem with this type of blog isn&#039;t it Rich - do I blog this or not - is a question I have to deal with EVERY SINGLE POST it seems.  Do I blog that a big company turned me down to exhibit?  Do I blog that a company that was exhibiting has pulled out?  

Transparency is sometimes ugly.  But do I really have a choice if I want to do this blog?  I don&#039;t think I do if I want this to be credible.

You mentioned on one of your posts I think about taking less money from a client in hopes for the big payoff because of results - is that much different than this?  Perhaps...

This blogging stuff ain&#039;t easy.

Tim</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s the problem with this type of blog isn&#8217;t it Rich &#8211; do I blog this or not &#8211; is a question I have to deal with EVERY SINGLE POST it seems.  Do I blog that a big company turned me down to exhibit?  Do I blog that a company that was exhibiting has pulled out?  </p>
<p>Transparency is sometimes ugly.  But do I really have a choice if I want to do this blog?  I don&#8217;t think I do if I want this to be credible.</p>
<p>You mentioned on one of your posts I think about taking less money from a client in hopes for the big payoff because of results &#8211; is that much different than this?  Perhaps&#8230;</p>
<p>This blogging stuff ain&#8217;t easy.</p>
<p>Tim</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rich Westerfield</title>
		<link>http://www.tradeshowstartup.com/2005/06/10/what-did-i-just-do/comment-page-1/#comment-20</link>
		<dc:creator>Rich Westerfield</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jun 2005 21:18:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tradeshowstartup.com/?p=31#comment-20</guid>
		<description>It wasn&#039;t a crazy idea until you posted it here.  Now that it&#039;s possible the entire world of podcasting will know Julie got a special deal - what do you think the odds are everyone else will want the same deal?

So, do I give you time to pull this post or just link to it now and get the snowball rolling?

On the &quot;no-pay show&quot; idea, if you vertically integrated... maybe you could do it.  As you&#039;re essentially disintermediating, you should be getting a decent cut of sales.  So let&#039;s say you had a fully functional ecommerce site with your exhibitors products on it and you offered attendees (not exhibitors) an incentive to purchase from your site (some % of your cut of the sale), you could capture some of those &quot;after the show&quot; sales.  Any exhibitor who doesn&#039;t make money for you gets cut out next year.  Not the easiest thing to do, but it could work.  Distributors wouldn&#039;t like it though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It wasn&#8217;t a crazy idea until you posted it here.  Now that it&#8217;s possible the entire world of podcasting will know Julie got a special deal &#8211; what do you think the odds are everyone else will want the same deal?</p>
<p>So, do I give you time to pull this post or just link to it now and get the snowball rolling?</p>
<p>On the &#8220;no-pay show&#8221; idea, if you vertically integrated&#8230; maybe you could do it.  As you&#8217;re essentially disintermediating, you should be getting a decent cut of sales.  So let&#8217;s say you had a fully functional ecommerce site with your exhibitors products on it and you offered attendees (not exhibitors) an incentive to purchase from your site (some % of your cut of the sale), you could capture some of those &#8220;after the show&#8221; sales.  Any exhibitor who doesn&#8217;t make money for you gets cut out next year.  Not the easiest thing to do, but it could work.  Distributors wouldn&#8217;t like it though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

